Free Access

Inhibition of vascular ectonucleotidase activities by the pro-drugs ticlopidine and clopidogrel favours platelet aggregation

Joanna Lecka

Centre de Recherche en Rhumatologie et Immunologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (Pavillon CHUL) and Départament de Microbiologie Infectiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author

Manjit Singh Rana,

Manjit Singh Rana

Search for more papers by this author

Jean Sévigny,

Jean Sévigny

Search for more papers by this author

Joanna Lecka,

Joanna Lecka

Search for more papers by this author

Manjit Singh Rana,

Manjit Singh Rana

Search for more papers by this author

Jean Sévigny,

Jean Sévigny

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 07 July 2010

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00951.x

Citations: 34

Jean Sévigny, Centre de Recherche en Rhumatologie et Immunologie, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, local T1-49, G1V 4G2 Québec, QC, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]

Share a link

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Wechat

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE After conversion to their active forms by the liver, ticlopidine and clopidogrel exert antiplatelet effects through irreversible inhibition of the P2Y₁₂ receptor. Concentrations of nucleotides such as ADP, the physiological agonist at platelet P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ receptors, are regulated by vascular ectonucleotidases, mainly nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase (NTPDase)1 and ecto-5′-nucleotidase. Here we evaluate the effect of these pro-drugs on vascular ectonucleotidase activity and on the natural function of these enzymes in regulating platelet aggregation.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Nucleotidase assays were performed by HPLC and by P_i determination, using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and protein extracts from transfected COS-7 cells as sources of enzymes. Platelet aggregation was assayed using human platelet-rich plasma.

KEY RESULTS Each pro-drug inhibited endothelial ectonucleotidase activities and decreased their ability to block platelet aggregation in vitro. At their therapeutic concentrations, ticlopidine (60 µM) and clopidogrel (20 µM) inhibited ADP hydrolysis by HUVEC by about 80%, and AMP hydrolysis by one-third. Accordingly, these compounds showed a mixed-type inhibition of recombinant human NTPDase1 with an apparent K_i (K_i,app) of 10 µM (clopidogrel) and 14 µM (ticlopidine). Recombinant rat ecto-5′-nucleotidase, but not its human orthologue, was inhibited by ticlopidine with a K_i,app of 4.5 mM.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS These pro-drugs facilitated platelet aggregation via the inhibition of vascular NTPDase1 in vitro. Further studies should be performed to assess whether this effect also occurs in vivo, especially at the beginning of treatment, before sufficient levels of active metabolites are produced by the liver.

Abbreviations

NTPDase: nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase
HUVEC: human umbilical vein endothelial cells

Introduction

The imbalance of extracellular purine levels in blood observed in various cardiovascular diseases is associated with complications characterized by uncontrolled blood clot formation (Ajjan and Grant, 2006; Vorchheimer and Becker, 2006), blood pressure fluctuations (Duprez and Cohn, 2006) and changes in the physiology of endothelial, smooth muscle and blood cells (Nadar et al., 2004; Corradi et al., 2005).

Extracellular nucleotides such as ATP and ADP exert their effects via the activation of purinoceptors collectively referred to as P2 receptors: the ligand-gated ion channels P2X1-7 and the G protein-coupled receptors P2Y_{1,2,4,6,11–14} (Ralevic and Burnstock, 1991; receptor nomenclature follows Alexander et al., 2009). Similarly, adenosine, the dephosphorylated product of ATP and ADP, is biologically active via other G protein-coupled P1 receptors (A_1,2A,2B,3) that modulate adenylate cyclase activity (Yaar et al., 2005). All these molecules, namely ATP, ADP and adenosine, modulate cardiovascular functions. ADP is a major platelet-recruiting factor that activates haemostasis via P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ receptors (Hechler et al., 2005). ATP stimulates endothelial cells to produce nitric oxide and prostacyclin, which have the ability to act as both vasodilators and inhibitors of platelet aggregation (Motte et al., 1995). Finally, adenosine inhibits platelet aggregation by activating the A_2A receptor on platelets and induces vasodilation via A_2B on smooth muscle cells (Hourani, 1996; Ansari et al., 2007).

The purine/nucleotide pool in the blood originates from different sources including exocytosis (platelets), shear stress (red blood cells), cell activation (platelets, endothelial cells) and cell lysis (Goldsmith et al., 1995; Morrell et al., 2005). In the blood, hydrolysis of these nucleotides is regulated by membrane-bound nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase (NTPDase)1[responsible for the hydrolysis of ATP &ADP] and ecto-5′-nucleotidase [responsible for the hydrolysis of AMP] at the surface of the vascular endothelium (Pearson et al., 1980; Kaczmarek et al., 1996; Marcus et al., 1997; Sévigny et al., 1997; Enjyoji et al., 1999; Kawashima et al., 2000). The pertinent hydrolytic products of the nucleotides selectively activate P1 and P2 pathways. AMP, the product of NTPDase1-driven hydrolysis of ATP and ADP, is the substrate for ecto-5′-nucleotidase that produces adenosine (Colgan et al., 2006). Hence, ectonucleotidases turn off P2 pathways, and simultaneously switch on the activation of P1 pathways (Koszalka et al., 2004; Robson et al., 2006), underlining the importance of both NTPDase1 and ecto-5′-nucleotidase as regulators of haemostasis (Kawashima et al., 2000; Sévigny et al., 2002). Therefore, the nucleotide pathways involved in the regulation of platelet aggregation may be targeted in order to prevent thrombus formation.

Thienopyridine drugs, such as ticlopidine (Tyklid) and clopidogrel (Plavix), exert their anti-aggregatory effects by irreversibly inhibiting the P2Y₁₂ receptor (Foster et al., 2001; Hollopeter et al., 2001; Cattaneo, 2006; Braun et al., 2007). Clinical studies have shown that these anti-platelet agents become effective 24 to 48 h after their administration, with a maximal effect achievable between 3 and 5 days, that is, only after a sufficient fraction of each pro-drug has been converted into an active drug by microsomal oxygenases in the liver (Kam and Nethery, 2003). Long-term treatment with thienopyridines is required to reach a 40–60% reduction in platelet aggregation (Kam and Nethery, 2003). Unfortunately, these drugs also demonstrate some undesirable side effects (Quinn and Fitzgerald, 1999). Ticlopidine therapy may be accompanied by the development of thrombotic thrombocytopaenic purpura-haemolytic uraemic syndrome, cutaneous exanthema, diarrhoea and reversible leucopaenia/agranulocytosis in patients with cerebrovascular diseases (Oster et al., 1994; Chinnakotla et al., 2000; Sempere et al., 2000). Clopidogrel has been reported to cause gastrointestinal haemorrhage (Hallas et al., 2006) and/or red and purple skin rashes (Makkar et al., 2006).

In this study, we report that ticlopidine and clopidogrel, in their pro-drug forms, directly affect the hydrolysis of nucleotides by vascular ectonucleotidases, which might lead to an undesired effect on platelet aggregation.

Methods

Plasmids

The plasmids encoding human NTPDase1 (GenBank accession no. U87967) and rat ecto-5′-nucleotidase (NM_021576) have been described in published reports (Misumi et al., 1990; Kaczmarek et al., 1996).

The cDNA encoding human ecto-5′-nucleotidase was cloned as follows. The cDNA was synthesized with SuperScript®II (Invitrogen) from 500 ng of total human liver RNA (AMBIOV; a gift from Dr C. Guillemette, CRCHUL) with oligo(dT)₁₈ as the primer, in accordance with manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). For amplification, 10% of the reverse transcription reaction was used as template in a final volume of 50 µL of a reaction mixture containing 0.6 µM primer, 400 µM dNTP and 3.5 U Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche, Laval, Canada). The following primers were designed based on the human ecto-5′-nucleotidase sequence from the NCBI database (NM_002526): forward sequence 5′-AGTTCACGCGCCACAGCTAT-3′ and reverse sequence 5′-AAGATGGTTTTTGCTGTCA-3′. Amplification was started by incubating the reaction mixture for 2 min at 94°C followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing for 1 min at 60°C and primer extension for 1 min at 72°C, with a final incubation of 7 min at 72°C. The PCR products of approximately 1.7 kb were purified on a 1% agarose gel using the QIAEX II gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Missisauga, Ontario, Canada) and ligated into the expression vector pcDNA3.1/V5-His (Invitrogen). Plasmids were purified with the QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen) and orientation of the inserts was determined by restriction enzyme mapping. One clone was amplified, fully sequenced in one direction and deposited in Gene Bank: DQ186653. These plasmids were used for transfection and activity assays.

Cell transfection and protein preparation

COS-7 cells were transfected in 10 cm plates using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) as described (Kaczmarek et al., 1996). Protein extracts from these transfected cells were also prepared as before (Kukulski et al., 2005). Briefly, Tris-saline buffer-washed cells were collected by scraping in harvesting buffer (95 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM PMSF, 10 µg·mL⁻¹ aprotinin and 45 mM Tris at pH 7.5) and sonicated. Nuclei and cellular debris were discarded by centrifugation and the supernatant, herein called the cell lysate or protein extract, was aliquoted and stored at −80°C until used for activity or platelet assays. Protein concentration was estimated by the Bradford microplate assay using bovine serum albumin as standard (Bradford, 1976).

Ectonucleotidase activities and kinetics

Enzyme activity of protein extracts was determined as previously described (Kukulski et al., 2005). Briefly, assays were carried out at 37°C in buffer A, for NTPDases, which consisted of 5 mM CaCl₂ and 80 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, with or without the indicated concentration of ticlopidine or clopidogrel (stock solutions in 80 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6.8). Assays for ecto-5′-nucleotidase were carried out in buffer B that consisted of the buffer A as above but CaCl₂ was replaced by 5 mM MgCl₂. Protein extracts were pre-incubated with the incubation mixture at 37°C for 3 min. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 0.5 mM ATP or ADP as substrate (down to 0.05 mM for kinetic assays), and stopped with malachite green reagent. For controls (consisting of the appropriate substrate and pro-drug), protein extracts were added after mixing the other components with the malachite green reagent. The activity at the surface of intact human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs, passage 2) or ectonucleotidase-transfected cells was measured in 24-well plates with the buffers indicated above supplemented with 125 mM NaCl. The reactions were initiated as above and stopped by transferring an aliquot of the reaction mixture to a tube containing the malachite green reagent. Net cell surface enzyme activity was calculated after subtracting the value measured in the control cell reaction mixture where the substrate was added after the malachite green reagent. Release of inorganic phosphate (P_i) was measured according to Baykov et al. (1988). All experiments were performed in triplicate. One unit of enzymatic activity corresponds to the release of 1 µmol P_i·min⁻¹·mg⁻¹ of protein or 1 µmol P_i·min⁻¹ per well at 37°C for protein extracts or intact cells respectively. Kinetic parameters (K_m,app, K_i,app and V_max) were determined by Eadie-Hofstee/Hanes-Woolf transformations and the Dixon method and the values were calculated using the GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). For some experiments, nucleotides were analysed in reaction samples by HPLC as described earlier (Kukulski et al., 2005).

Platelet aggregation assays

The ethical investigation standards conformed to principles outlined in the Helsinki declaration (Puri et al., 2009). Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was prepared from the blood of healthy volunteers according to standard procedures (Sévigny et al., 2002). Briefly, whole blood was collected in heparinized tubes, centrifuged at room temperature at 300×g for 12 min, and the upper layer comprising the PRP was collected. The interval between blood collection and the beginning of platelet aggregation assays never exceeded 2 h. Platelet aggregation was either measured using an AggRAM aggregometer, or by spectrophotometry, using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices). The extent of platelet aggregation corresponded to the increase in light transmission or decrease in optical density at 600 nm in 0.6 mL (aggregometer) or 0.2 mL (spectrophotometer) of PRP samples maintained at 37°C. Platelet-poor plasma (PPP) was used as the reference standard. Platelet aggregation was initiated with 5 to 20 µM ADP. Where indicated, lysates from NTPDase1-transfected COS-7 cells (4–6 µg diluted in incubation buffer A with 145 mM NaCl) or HUVECs treated or not with a CD39-specific shRNA or a scrambled shRNA (2 × 10⁶ HUVECs scraped into a 135 mM KCl/15 mM sodium citrate solution, washed twice and resuspended in incubation buffer A in the presence of 145 mM NaCl with or without test drugs, were added to PRP. Note that appropriate control experiments contained either incubation buffer with intact COS-7 cells, protein extracts from non-transfected COS-7 cells, or an equivalent amount of the water used to dilute the pro-drugs.

For the parallel assays using light microscopy, 100 µL of the above reaction mixture were put on microscope slides 10 min after the initiation of platelet aggregation by ADP addition. These slides were then air dried at 37°C and stained using the Diff-Quick kit (Dade Behring Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA). The remainder of the reaction mixture was spun at 300×g for 3 min, and free platelets in the supernatant were counted.

Statistics

Comparisons between the shapes of the different platelet aggregation curves and of the ectonucleotidase assays were drawn, using the two-tailed t-test for unpaired data. A value of P < 0.01 was considered as statistically significant.

Materials

ATP, ADP, AMP, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, bovine serum albumin, KCl, malachite green and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Ammonium molybdate, NaCl, Tris and Tween 20 were provided by EMD Chemicals (Gibbstown, NJ). CaCl₂ and MgCl₂ were acquired from Fisher Scientific (Ottawa, ON, Canada), DMEM/F12 from Invitrogen (Burlington, ON, Canada) and fetal bovine serum from Wisent Bioproducts (St-Bruno, QC, Canada).

Results

The pro-drugs ticlopidine and clopidogrel do not inhibit P2Y₁₂ receptors directly, that is, without metabolic activation (Foster et al., 2001; Kam and Nethery, 2003), so we assessed whether or not they might influence the process of haemostasis. The concentration of the pro-drug in the blood of patients treated by oral or i.v. administration has been reported to be in the order of 60 µM for ticlopidine and 20 µM for clopidogrel (Kam and Nethery, 2003). At these concentrations, pro-drugs decreased the ability of HUVECs to block ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation (Figure 1A), which correlated with changes in the catabolism of purines by NTPDase1 (CD39) at the cell surface. Ticlopidine and clopidogrel each inhibited the hydrolysis of ADP and ATP by about 80% and 30% respectively (Figure 2A). Notably, this inhibition did not increase after a longer pre-incubation of HUVECs with pro-drugs prior to the assay, as demonstrated by the 3 min, and 3, 7 and 32 h results (Figure 2B and data not shown). Both ticlopidine and clopidogrel also inhibited HUVEC-driven AMP hydrolysis by about 37% and 17% respectively (Figure 2A). HPLC analyses of nucleotides and nucleosides at the end of the incubations confirmed the inhibition of HUVEC ATPase, ADPase and AMPase activities by thienopyridines (data not shown). As a control, knock-down of the expression of NTPDase1, that is, the enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of ADP at the surface of HUVECs, using a specific shRNA, similarly reduced the ability of these cells to block platelet aggregation (Figure 1B). The efficacy of the shRNA was evaluated by FACS (13% decrease of CD39 cell surface expression) and by an activity assay using ADP as substrate (30% decrease). A scrambled shRNA did not affect these parameters when compared with untreated HUVEC (Figure 1B and data not shown).

Details are in the caption following the image — **Figure 1**
Open in figure viewer PowerPoint

Ticlopidine and clopidogrel decrease the ability of HUVEC (2 × 10⁶ cells) to block ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Where indicated, cells with or without 60 µM ticlopidine or 20 µM clopidogrel were pre-incubated in 0.6 mL platelet-rich plasma (PRP) 3 min before stimulation with 8 µM ADP. The ability of HUVECs to block platelet aggregation was diminished by ticlopidine, clopidogrel (A), and by a specific shRNA that partly inhibits NTPDase1 expression, but was not affected by a control (ctrl) shRNA (B). In control assays, COS-7 cells, which are devoid of ADPase and AMPase activity, did not modify ADP-induced platelet aggregation. This number of intact HUVECs released 6 or 4.8 µmol P_i·min⁻¹ with ADP or AMP as substrate respectively. A representative experiment is shown. All 12 experiments performed showed similar trends with these thienopyridines. NTPDase, nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell.

We next examined the effect of ticlopidine and clopidogrel on the activity of two recombinant vascular ectonucleotidases, namely NTPDase1 and ecto-5′-nucleotidase, using protein extracts from transfected COS-7 cells. As expected, these pro-drugs inhibited ADP hydrolysis more efficiently than that of ATP (Figure 3A). Significantly, ticlopidine, at the concentration reported in the blood of treated patients (60 µM), inhibited the hydrolysis of ADP by recombinant human NTPDase1 by about 50%, an effect that was observed with concentrations of clopidogrel ranging from 10 to 60 µM. Interestingly, ticlopidine did not affect human recombinant NTPDase2, 3 and 8 at concentrations up to 0.1 mM (data not shown), thus excluding an effect of ticlopidine on these enzymes in HUVECs. Because the AMPase activity in HUVECs was slightly inhibited by both thienopyridines (Figure 2A), we tested the effect of these pro-drugs on recombinant ecto-5′-nucleotidases. While clopidogrel did not affect rat ecto-5′-nucleotidase activity, a concentration of ticlopidine of 300 µM was required to inhibit ∼25% of the enzyme activity, that is, a level estimated to be fivefold higher than the clinical concentration found in the plasma of ticlopidine-treated patients (Figure 3B). We next assessed whether the activity of human ecto-5′-nucleotidase was also affected by thienopyridines. For this purpose, we first cloned an ecto-5′-nucleotidase cDNA from liver RNA via RT-PCR using primers derived from the database sequence (NM_002526). The cDNA sequence thereby obtained was deposited to GenBank (DQ186653) and was found to be nearly identical to the original sequence NM_002526 except for an A > G change at nucleotide 1145, resulting in a Thr > Ala exchange at residue 386. Clopidogrel and ticlopidine had no effect on human ecto-5′-nucleotidase activity (Figure 3B). The basis for the difference in the effect of ticlopidine on human versus rat recombinant ecto-5′-nucleotidase is not clear as these isoforms are highly similar, with >90% amino acid homology and have similar substrate kinetics and show similar inhibition patterns by their natural inhibitors, ATP and ADP (Table 1 and Figure 4).

Table 1.
Kinetic parameters of vascular ectonucleotidases in presence or absence of thienopyridines

	Rat	Human	Human NTPDase1 (ADP as substrate)
	Ecto-5′-nucleotidase		Human NTPDase1 (ADP as substrate)
K _m (µM)	20	18	22*
V _max (U·mg protein⁻¹)	5.9	1.1	0.75*
K _i,app for ticlopidine (mM)	4.5	Not inhibited	0.014
K _i,app for clopidogrel (mM)	Not inhibited	Not inhibited	0.010

The kinetic parameters were evaluated using protein extract from the indicated recombinant enzymes transiently expressed in COS-7 cells.
* From Kukulski et al. (2005).
NTPDase, nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase.

We further characterized the kinetic parameters for the inhibition of NTPDase1 and ecto-5′-nucleotidase by thienopyridines. Both enzymes showed mixed-type inhibition, indicating that the inhibition was mainly competitive and therefore partly reversible. The estimated apparent K_i (K_i,app) values for human NTPDase1 (14 µM for ticlopidine and 10 µM for clopidogrel) were about 300-fold lower than for rat ecto-5′-nucleotidase (4.5 mM for ticlopidine; Table 1) and fourfold lower than the expected concentration of ticlopidine in the blood of treated patients. These calculations show that ticlopidine inhibits NTPDase1 more potently than ecto-5′-nucleotidase, and further support the view that the inhibition of NTPDase1 by these pro-drugs may have therapeutic relevance (cf. ‘Discussion’).

We next estimated the consequence of NTPDase1 inhibition on platelet aggregation using the recombinant enzyme. As expected, the inhibition of platelet aggregation by human NTPDase1 was attenuated in the presence of ticlopidine (Figure 5A). The difference between the curves obtained in the presence of NTPDase1 with or without ticlopidine was statistically different (P < 0.01) from 100 s to the end of the 10 min recorded assay, as determined in separate experiments with a plate reader (Figure 5B). This effect was immediate and similar to that obtained with the NTPDase1 inhibitor ARL 67156, used as an additional control (Figure 5A). Note that this inhibitor only partially inhibits NTPDase1 activity (Lévesque et al., 2007). Pre-incubation of NTPDase1 with ticlopidine for 3 or 10 min showed similar results (data not shown). In agreement with its weaker inhibition of recombinant NTPDase1, clopidogrel was less efficient to reduce the ability of NTPDase1 to block platelet aggregation (Figure 5A).

Light microscopy further confirmed the above observation. Additionally, it allowed a more systematic quantification of these effects. With this method we have shown that, in the presence of thienopyridines, human NTPDase1 did not prevent the formation of platelet aggregates (Figure 5C) and the number of non-aggregated platelets in the mixture with human NTPDase1 was reduced to the levels observed in absence of the enzyme (Figure 5D).

Discussion

Although thrombogenesis is an essential function of platelets, under certain conditions complications may lead to vascular disorders (Cutlip et al., 2001; Evens et al., 2002). Ticlopidine and clopidogrel are routinely administered to patients as part of an antithrombotic therapy (Lee et al., 2005). Various studies have documented a delay of 3 and 5 days for clopidogrel and ticlopidine, respectively, to become fully effective (Di Minno et al., 1985; Boneu and Destelle, 1996; Kam and Nethery, 2003). Upon intravenous or oral administration, these pro-drugs are converted into their reactive thiol derivatives via a cytochrome P450 pathway in the liver (Savi et al., 1994). Furthermore, only a small percentage of the daily dose of these pro-drugs (250 mg for ticlopidine or 75 mg for clopidogrel) is transformed to the respective active drug, explaining both the delay in achieving their steady state effectiveness in vivo, and their lack of activity in vitro (Kam and Nethery, 2003).

Nucleoside- and nucleotide-regulated haemostasis in blood may be an important modulator of the development of cardiovascular and immunological complications (Hourani, 1996; Hechler et al., 2005; Waehre et al., 2006; Ansari et al., 2007; Armstrong et al., 2009). Hence, vascular endothelium-derived ectonucleotidases NTPDase1 and ecto-5′-nucleotidase that regulate the concentration of nucleosides and nucleotides in the blood may also be considered as critical regulators of these complications (Kaczmarek et al., 1996; Marcus et al., 1997; Enjyoji et al., 1999; Kawashima et al., 2000; Sévigny et al., 2002; Guckelberger et al., 2004; Koszalka et al., 2004; Colgan et al., 2006). In this work we observed that thienopyridines, in their respective pro-drug form, facilitate platelet aggregation by inhibiting NTPDase1 activity (1, 5). At the concentration expected in the plasma of treated patients (60 µM ticlopidine and 20 µM clopidogrel), these pro-drugs reduced the efficiency of vascular endothelial cells to prevent platelet aggregation by inhibiting (by 80%) ADP hydrolysis by HUVECs as a result of NTPDase1 inhibition (2, 3). We previously reported that NTPDase1 prevents not only ADP-induced platelet aggregation but also the aggregation induced by collagen and low concentrations of thrombin, emphasizing the importance of ADP (mostly derived from platelet granules) in promoting efficient platelet aggregation (Enjyoji et al., 1999).

Kinetic analysis of the recombinant NTPDase1 showed a mixed-type inhibition by ticlopidine and clopidogrel with K_i,app values of 14 and 10 µM (Table 1) that is, ∼25% and 50% of their effective therapeutic concentrations respectively. Such inhibition of NTPDase1 activity might facilitate thrombus formation due to the accumulation of ADP, the natural ligand of P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ (Hechler et al., 2005). Of note, ticlopidine and clopidogrel also blocked AMP hydrolysis to adenosine by 37% and 17%, respectively (Figure 2A), which might also be expected to promote platelet aggregation. HPLC analysis of HUVEC supernatants incubated with equimolar concentrations of ATP and ADP confirmed that ADP hydrolysis was inhibited in the presence of thienopyridines, and that adenosine formation was reduced (data not shown). The decrease in adenosine concentration was due to the inhibition of AMPase by the pro-drugs, as well as to the presence of higher concentrations of ATP and ADP, which are endogenous inhibitors of ecto-5′-nucleotidase (Figure 4 and data not shown). However, this partial inhibition of ecto-5′-nucleotidase activity in HUVECs by thienopyridines could not be reproduced with a protein extract from the recombinant form of the enzyme (2, 3). The reason for this difference is unclear. It is noteworthy that the inhibition of the ectonucleotidase activities for all purines (ATP, ADP and AMP) was more pronounced with intact HUVECs than with cell lysates, containing the individual recombinant enzymes. The observed effect was direct and did not require any pre-incubation (Figure 2B). This observation suggests that the microenvironment in the vascular endothelial cells could make these enzymes more sensitive to inhibition by the pro-drugs, thereby facilitating platelet aggregation.

Of interest, the data presented here suggest that ticlopidine might be used as a selective inhibitor of human NTPDase1. Indeed, at 100 µM, ticlopidine did not affect the activity of other plasma membrane-bound NTPDases (data not shown), whereas it inhibited recombinant NTPDase1 by >50% (Figure 3A). This finding is of great potential interest as there are very few specific inhibitors so far that are selective for a limited subset of the different ectonucleotidases.

In summary, therapeutic concentrations of ticlopidine and clopidogrel inhibit vascular NTPDase1 activity and the enzymes' ability to block platelet aggregation in vitro. These data suggest that these effects also occur in vivo, especially at the beginning of ticlopidine and clopidogrel therapy, before sufficient levels of the active metabolites are produced by the liver to inhibit platelet aggregation. This intriguing hypothesis warrants future studies.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and by a small pilot grant from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ) to JS who was also the recipient of a New Investigator award from the CIHR and of a Junior 2 scholarship from the FRSQ. We also thank Dr Richard Poulin of our in-house editing services (CHUQ, pavillon CHUL, Université Laval) for the edition of this paper.

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Supporting Information

References

Ajjan R, Grant PJ (2006). Coagulation and atherothrombotic disease. Atherosclerosis 186: 240–259.
10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.10.042
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Alexander SPH, Mathie A, Peters JA (2009). Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC), 4th edn. Br J Pharmacol 158 (Suppl. 1): S1–S254.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Ansari HR, Nadeem A, Talukder MA, Sakhalkar S, Mustafa SJ (2007). Evidence for the involvement of nitric oxide in A2B receptor-mediated vasorelaxation of mouse aorta. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292: H719–H725.
10.1152/ajpheart.00593.2006
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Armstrong PCJ, Dhanji AR, Tucker AT, Mitchell JA, Warner TD (2009). Reduction of platelet thromboxane A2 production ex vivo and in vivo by clopidogrel therapy. J Thromb Haemost 8: 613–615.
10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03714.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Baykov AA, Evtushenko OA, Avaeva SM (1988). A malachite green procedure for orthophosphate determination and its use in alkaline phosphatase-based enzyme immunoassay. Anal Biochem 171: 266–270.
10.1016/0003-2697(88)90484-8
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Boneu B, Destelle G (1996). Platelet anti-aggregating activity and tolerance of clopidogrel in atherosclerotic patients. Thromb Haemost 76: 939–943.
10.1055/s-0038-1650689
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Bradford MM (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analyt Biochem 72: 248–254.
10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Braun OO, Amisten S, Wihlborg AK, Hunting K, Nilsson D, Erlinge D (2007). Residual platelet ADP reactivity after clopidogrel treatment is dependent on activation of both the unblocked P2Y1 and the P2Y12 receptor and is correlated with protein expression of P2Y12. Purinergic Signal 3: 195–201.
10.1007/s11302-006-9028-9
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Cattaneo M (2006). ADP receptors: inhibitory strategies for antiplatelet therapy. Timely Top Med Cardiovasc Dis 10: E22.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chinnakotla S, Leone JP, Fidler ME, Hammeke MD, Tarantolo S (2000). Clopidogrel-associated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome in a kidney/pancreas transplant recipient. Transplantation 70: 550–552.
10.1097/00007890-200008150-00029
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Colgan SP, Holger KE, Eckle T, Thompson LF (2006). Physiological roles for ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73). Purinergic Signal 2: 351–360.
10.1007/s11302-005-5302-5
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
Corradi D, Callegari S, Benussi S, Maestri R, Pastori P, Nascimbene S et al. (2005). Myocyte changes and their left atrial distribution in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation related to mitral valve disease. Hum Pathol 36: 1080–1089.
10.1016/j.humpath.2005.07.018
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Cutlip DE, Baim DS, Ho KK, Popma JJ, Lansky AJ, Cohen DJ et al. (2001). Stent thrombosis in the modern era: a pooled analysis of multicenter coronary stent clinical trials. Circulation 103: 1967–1971.
10.1161/01.CIR.103.15.1967
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Di Minno G, Cerbone AM, Mattioli PL, Turco S, Iovine C, Mancini M (1985). Functionally thrombasthenic state in normal platelets following the administration of ticlopidine. J Clin Invest 75: 328–338.
10.1172/JCI111705
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Duprez DA, Cohn JN (2006). Monitoring vascular health beyond blood pressure. Curr Hypertens Rep 8: 287–291.
10.1007/s11906-006-0066-z
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Enjyoji K, Sévigny J, Lin Y, Frenette PS, Christie PD, Schulte Am Esch J, II et al. (1999). Targeted disruption of CD39/ATP diphosphohydrolase results in disordered hemostasis and thromboregulation. Nat Med 5: 1010–1017.
10.1038/12447
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Evens AM, Kwaan HC, Kaufman DB, Bennett CL (2002). TTP/HUS occurring in a simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipient after clopidogrel treatment: evidence of a nonimmunological etiology. Transplantation 74: 885–887.
10.1097/00007890-200209270-00026
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Foster CJ, Prosser DM, Agans JM, Zhai Y, Smith MD, Lachowicz JE et al. (2001). Molecular identification and characterization of the platelet ADP receptor targeted by thienopyridine antithrombotic drugs. J Clin Invest 107: 1591–1598.
10.1172/JCI12242
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Goldsmith HL, Bell DN, Braovac S, Steinberg A, McIntosh F (1995). Physical and chemical effects of red cells in the shear-induced aggregation of human platelets. Biophys J 69: 1584–1595.
10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80031-7
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Guckelberger O, Sun XF, Sévigny J, Imai M, Kaczmarek E, Enjyoji K et al. (2004). Beneficial effects of CD39/ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 in murine intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Thromb Haemost 91: 576–586.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Hallas J, Dall M, Andries A, Andersen BS, Aalykke C, Hansen JM et al. (2006). Use of single and combined antithrombotic therapy and risk of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding: population based case-control study. BMJ 333: 726.
10.1136/bmj.38947.697558.AE
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Hechler B, Cattaneo M, Gachet C (2005). The P2 receptors in platelet function. Semin Thromb Hemost 31: 150–161.
10.1055/s-2005-869520
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Hollopeter G, Jantzen H-M, Vincent D, Li G, England L, Ramakrishnan V et al. (2001). Identification of the platelet ADP receptor targeted by antithrombotic drugs. Nature 409: 202–207.
10.1038/35051599
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Hourani SM (1996). Purinoceptors and platelet aggregation. J Auton Pharmacol 16: 349–352.
10.1111/j.1474-8673.1996.tb00051.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Kaczmarek E, Koziak K, Sévigny J, Siegel JB, Anrather J, Beaudoin AR et al. (1996). Identification and characterization of CD39 vascular ATP diphosphohydrolase. J Biol Chem 271: 33116–33122.
10.1074/jbc.271.51.33116
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Kam PC, Nethery CM (2003). The thienopyridine derivatives (platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists), pharmacology and clinical developments. Anaesthesia 58: 28–35.
10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02960.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Kawashima Y, Nagasawa T, Ninomiya H (2000). Contribution of ecto-5′-nucleotidase to the inhibition of platelet aggregation by human endothelial cells. Blood 96: 2157–2162.
10.1182/blood.V96.6.2157
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Koszalka P, Ozuyaman B, Huo Y, Zernecke A, Flogel U, Braun N et al. (2004). Targeted disruption of cd73/ecto-5′-nucleotidase alters thromboregulation and augments vascular inflammatory response. Circ Res 95: 814–821.
10.1161/01.RES.0000144796.82787.6f
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Kukulski F, Lévesque SA, Lavoie EG, Lecka J, Bigonnesse F, Knowles AF et al. (2005). Comparative hydrolysis of P2 receptor agonists by NTPDases 1, 2, 3 and 8. Purinergic Signal 1: 193–204.
10.1007/s11302-005-6217-x
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
Lee SW, Park SW, Hong MK, Kim YH, Lee BK, Song JM et al. (2005). Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting: impact on stent thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 46: 1833–1837.
10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.048
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Lévesque SA, Lavoie EG, Lecka J, Bigonnesse F, Sévigny J (2007). Specificity of the ecto-ATPase inhibitor ARL 67156 on human and mouse ectonucleotidases. Br J Pharmacol 152: 141–150.
10.1038/sj.bjp.0707361
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Makkar K, Wilensky RL, Julien MB, Herrmann HC, Spinler SA (2006). Rash with both clopidogrel and ticlopidine in two patients following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Ann Pharmacother 40: 1204–1207.
10.1345/aph.1G587
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Marcus AJ, Broekman MJ, Drosopoulos JHF, Islam N, Alyonycheva TN, Safier LB et al. (1997). The endothelial cell ecto-ADPase responsible for inhibition of platelet function is CD39. J Clin Invest 99: 1351–1360.
10.1172/JCI119294
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Misumi Y, Ogata S, Hirose S, Ikehara Y (1990). Primary structure of rat liver 5′-nucleotidase deduced from the cDNA. Presence of the COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain for possible post-translational modification by glycophospholipid. J Biol Chem 265: 2178–2183.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Morrell CN, Matsushita K, Chiles K, Scharpf RB, Yamakuchi M, Mason RJ et al. (2005). Regulation of platelet granule exocytosis by S-nitrosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 3782–3787.
10.1073/pnas.0408310102
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Motte S, Communi D, Pirotton S, Boeynaems JM (1995). Involvement of multiple receptors in the actions of extracellular ATP: the example of vascular endothelial cells. [Review]. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 27: 1–7.
10.1016/1357-2725(94)00059-X
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Nadar SK, Lip GY, Blann AD (2004). Platelet morphology, soluble P selectin and platelet P-selectin in acute ischaemic stroke. The West Birmingham Stroke Project. Thromb Haemost 92: 1342–1348.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Oster G, Huse DM, Lacey MJ, Epstein AM (1994). Cost-effectiveness of ticlopidine in preventing stroke in high-risk patients. Stroke 25: 1149–1156.
10.1161/01.STR.25.6.1149
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Pearson JD, Carleton JS, Gordon JL (1980). Metabolism of adenine nucleotides by ectoenzymes of vascular endothelial and smooth-muscle cells in culture. Biochem J 190: 421–429.
10.1042/bj1900421
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Puri KS, Suresh KR, Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. (2009). Declaration of Helsinki, 2008: implications for stakeholders in research. J Postgrad Med 55: 131–134.
10.4103/0022-3859.52846
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Quinn MJ, Fitzgerald DJ (1999). Ticlopidine and clopidogrel. Circulation 100: 1667–1672.
10.1161/01.CIR.100.15.1667
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Ralevic V, Burnstock G (1991). Roles of P2-purinoceptors in the cardiovascular system. Circulation 84: 1–14.
10.1161/01.CIR.84.1.1
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Robson SC, Sévigny J, Zimmermann H (2006). The E-NTPDase family of ectonucleotidases: structure function relationships and pathophysiological significance. Purinergic Signal 2: 409–430.
10.1007/s11302-006-9003-5
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
Savi P, Combalbert J, Gaich C, Rouchon MC, Maffrand JP, Berger Y et al. (1994). The antiaggregating activity of clopidogrel is due to a metabolic activation by the hepatic cytochrome P450-1A. Thromb Haemost 72: 313–317.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Sempere AP, Ferrero M, Tahoces ML, Duarte J, Tabernero C, Cabezas C et al. (2000). [Side effects of antithrombotic treatment in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease]. Rev Neurol 30: 5–7.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Sévigny J, Levesque FP, Grondin G, Beaudoin AR (1997). Purification of the blood vessel ATP diphosphohydrolase, identification and localization by immunological techniques. Biochim Biophys Acta 1334: 73–88.
10.1016/S0304-4165(96)00079-7
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Sévigny J, Sundberg C, Braun N, Guckelberger O, Csizmadia E, Qawi I et al. (2002). Differential catalytic properties and vascular topography of murine nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (NTPDase1) and NTPDase2 have implications for thromboregulation. Blood 99: 2801–2809.
10.1182/blood.V99.8.2801
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Vorchheimer DA, Becker R (2006). Platelets in atherothrombosis. Mayo Clin Proc 81: 59–68.
10.4065/81.1.59
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Waehre T, Damas JK, Pedersen TM, Gullestad L, Yndestad A, Andreassen AK et al. (2006). Clopidogrel increases expression of chemokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with coronary artery disease: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Thromb Haemost 4: 2140–2147.
10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02131.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Yaar R, Jones MR, Chen JF, Ravid K (2005). Animal models for the study of adenosine receptor function. J Cell Physiol 202: 9–20.
10.1002/jcp.20138
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume161, Issue5

November 2010

Pages 1150-1160

Inhibition of vascular ectonucleotidase activities by the pro-drugs ticlopidine and clopidogrel favours platelet aggregation